RA vs RFM

Brookfield Real Assets Income F vs RiverNorth Flexible Municipal I — Valuation Comparison 2026

RA

Asset Management
Brookfield Real Assets Income F
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$12.82
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

RFM

Asset Management
RiverNorth Flexible Municipal I
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$14.61
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType RA Fair ValueRA Upside RFM Fair ValueRFM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.39 -73.5% $3.87 -73.5%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $15.18 +17.4% $9.53 -34.8%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for RA vs RFM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

RA vs RFM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

Both RA and RFM score 1.7/10 on quality. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Brookfield Real Assets Income F (RA) and RiverNorth Flexible Municipal I (RFM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

RA currently trades at $12.82 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while RFM trades at $14.61 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).