PSO vs WLYB

Pearson, Plc vs John Wiley & Sons, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PSO

Books: Publishing or Publishing & Printing
Pearson, Plc
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$14.82
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

WLYB

Books: Publishing or Publishing & Printing
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$41.05
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PSO Fair ValuePSO Upside WLYB Fair ValueWLYB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.97 +28.0% $23.58 -42.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.61 -89.2% $25.51 -37.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PSO vs WLYB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PSO vs WLYB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

WLYB scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs PSO's 7.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Pearson, Plc (PSO) and John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (WLYB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PSO currently trades at $14.82 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while WLYB trades at $41.05 with a QOC of 7.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).