PRTS vs SMP

CarParts.com, Inc. vs Standard Motor Products, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PRTS

Auto Parts
CarParts.com, Inc.
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$5.81
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

SMP

Auto Parts
Standard Motor Products, Inc.
Quality
7.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$40.59
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PRTS Fair ValuePRTS Upside SMP Fair ValueSMP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.98 +226.6% $1.04 -97.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $20.14 -50.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $0.16 -97.4% $69.49 +71.2%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PRTS vs SMP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PRTS vs SMP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SMP scores higher with a 7.9/10 quality rating vs PRTS's 6.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing CarParts.com, Inc. (PRTS) and Standard Motor Products, Inc. (SMP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PRTS currently trades at $5.81 with a QOC of 6.2/10, while SMP trades at $40.59 with a QOC of 7.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).