PRLB vs VATE

Proto Labs, Inc. vs INNOVATE Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PRLB

Fabricated Structural Metal Products
Proto Labs, Inc.
Quality
8.4
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$75.76
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

VATE

Fabricated Structural Metal Products
INNOVATE Corp.
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
17
SAFE
Price
$15.23
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PRLB Fair ValuePRLB Upside VATE Fair ValueVATE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $34.64 -54.3% $74.55 +389.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $17.12 -77.4% $54.47 +257.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PRLB vs VATE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PRLB vs VATE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PRLB scores higher with a 8.4/10 quality rating vs VATE's 6.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Proto Labs, Inc. (PRLB) and INNOVATE Corp. (VATE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PRLB currently trades at $75.76 with a QOC of 8.4/10, while VATE trades at $15.23 with a QOC of 6.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).