PRK vs RF

Park National Corporation vs Regions Financial Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

PRK

National Commercial Banks
Park National Corporation
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$171.56
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

RF

National Commercial Banks
Regions Financial Corporation
Quality
8.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$28.00
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PRK Fair ValuePRK Upside RF Fair ValueRF Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $101.31 -40.9% $21.86 -21.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $155.27 -9.5% $28.59 +2.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PRK vs RF — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PRK vs RF — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PRK scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs RF's 8.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Park National Corporation (PRK) and Regions Financial Corporation (RF) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PRK currently trades at $171.56 with a QOC of 8.9/10, while RF trades at $28.00 with a QOC of 8.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).