PRHI vs SIGI

Presurance Holdings, Inc. vs Selective Insurance Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PRHI

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Presurance Holdings, Inc.
Quality
4.5
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$0.65
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

SIGI

Insurance - Property & Casualty
Selective Insurance Group, Inc.
Quality
5.6
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$87.29
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PRHI Fair ValuePRHI Upside SIGI Fair ValueSIGI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.36 -44.3% $38.80 -55.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $53.22 -39.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $0.33 -52.9% $121.00 +38.6%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PRHI vs SIGI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PRHI vs SIGI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SIGI scores higher with a 5.6/10 quality rating vs PRHI's 4.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Presurance Holdings, Inc. (PRHI) and Selective Insurance Group, Inc. (SIGI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PRHI currently trades at $0.65 with a QOC of 4.5/10, while SIGI trades at $87.29 with a QOC of 5.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).