PRE vs RDNT

Prenetics Global Limited vs RadNet, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PRE

Diagnostics & Research
Prenetics Global Limited
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$20.18
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

RDNT

Diagnostics & Research
RadNet, Inc.
Quality
6.2
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$55.31
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PRE Fair ValuePRE Upside RDNT Fair ValueRDNT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $5.51 -72.7% $43.13 -22.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $7.16 -58.0% $8.29 -85.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PRE vs RDNT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PRE vs RDNT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RDNT scores higher with a 6.2/10 quality rating vs PRE's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Prenetics Global Limited (PRE) and RadNet, Inc. (RDNT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PRE currently trades at $20.18 with a QOC of 4.7/10, while RDNT trades at $55.31 with a QOC of 6.2/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).