PRDO vs STRA

Perdoceo Education Corporation vs Strategic Education, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PRDO

Education & Training Services
Perdoceo Education Corporation
Quality
9.8
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$33.09
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

STRA

Education & Training Services
Strategic Education, Inc.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$77.20
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PRDO Fair ValuePRDO Upside STRA Fair ValueSTRA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $33.84 +2.3% $55.56 -28.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $28.30 -14.5% $73.12 -5.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PRDO vs STRA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PRDO vs STRA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PRDO scores higher with a 9.8/10 quality rating vs STRA's 7.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) and Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PRDO currently trades at $33.09 with a QOC of 9.8/10, while STRA trades at $77.20 with a QOC of 7.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).