PRDO vs RYET

Perdoceo Education Corporation vs Ruanyun Edai Technology Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PRDO

Education & Training Services
Perdoceo Education Corporation
Quality
9.8
out of 10
Value Trap
25
LOW
Price
$33.09
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

RYET

Education & Training Services
Ruanyun Edai Technology Inc.
Quality
4.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.93
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PRDO Fair ValuePRDO Upside RYET Fair ValueRYET Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $33.84 +2.3% $0.26 -71.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $28.30 -14.5% $0.52 -55.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PRDO vs RYET — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PRDO vs RYET — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PRDO scores higher with a 9.8/10 quality rating vs RYET's 4.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) and Ruanyun Edai Technology Inc. (RYET) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PRDO currently trades at $33.09 with a QOC of 9.8/10, while RYET trades at $0.93 with a QOC of 4.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).