PNNT vs PTY

PennantPark Investment Corporat vs Pimco Corporate & Income Opport — Valuation Comparison 2026

PNNT

Asset Management
PennantPark Investment Corporat
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$3.91
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

PTY

Asset Management
Pimco Corporate & Income Opport
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.85
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PNNT Fair ValuePNNT Upside PTY Fair ValuePTY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $9.59 +145.3% $3.50 -70.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.47 +193.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $19.87 +408.2% $7.88 -33.5%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PNNT vs PTY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PNNT vs PTY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PNNT scores higher with a 6.8/10 quality rating vs PTY's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing PennantPark Investment Corporat (PNNT) and Pimco Corporate & Income Opport (PTY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PNNT currently trades at $3.91 with a QOC of 6.8/10, while PTY trades at $11.85 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).