PMTR vs POLE

Perimeter Acquisition Corp. I vs Andretti Acquisition Corp. II — Valuation Comparison 2026

PMTR

Blank Checks
Perimeter Acquisition Corp. I
Quality
4.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$10.43
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

POLE

Blank Checks
Andretti Acquisition Corp. II
Quality
5.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$10.73
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PMTR Fair ValuePMTR Upside POLE Fair ValuePOLE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.00 -90.3% $1.32 -87.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.17 -88.6% $1.54 -85.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PMTR vs POLE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PMTR vs POLE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

POLE scores higher with a 5.0/10 quality rating vs PMTR's 4.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Perimeter Acquisition Corp. I (PMTR) and Andretti Acquisition Corp. II (POLE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PMTR currently trades at $10.43 with a QOC of 4.2/10, while POLE trades at $10.73 with a QOC of 5.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).