PKBK vs PLBC

Parke Bancorp, Inc. vs Plumas Bancorp — Valuation Comparison 2026

PKBK

Banks - Regional
Parke Bancorp, Inc.
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$31.19
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

PLBC

Banks - Regional
Plumas Bancorp
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$52.58
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PKBK Fair ValuePKBK Upside PLBC Fair ValuePLBC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $22.07 -29.2% $22.13 -57.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $39.26 +25.9% $45.60 -13.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PKBK vs PLBC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PKBK vs PLBC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PLBC scores higher with a 8.8/10 quality rating vs PKBK's 8.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Parke Bancorp, Inc. (PKBK) and Plumas Bancorp (PLBC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PKBK currently trades at $31.19 with a QOC of 8.7/10, while PLBC trades at $52.58 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).