PHYS vs SPPP

"Sprott Physical Gold Trust" vs "Sprott Physical Platinum and P — Valuation Comparison 2026

PHYS

Commodity Contracts Brokers & Dealers
"Sprott Physical Gold Trust"
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$34.42
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

SPPP

Commodity Contracts Brokers & Dealers
"Sprott Physical Platinum and P
Quality
6.0
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$14.92
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PHYS Fair ValuePHYS Upside SPPP Fair ValueSPPP Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $78.35 +127.6% $3.16 -78.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $165.65 +381.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $17.49 -49.2% $13.57 -9.1%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PHYS vs SPPP — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PHYS vs SPPP — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PHYS scores higher with a 6.0/10 quality rating vs SPPP's 6.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing "Sprott Physical Gold Trust" (PHYS) and "Sprott Physical Platinum and P (SPPP) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PHYS currently trades at $34.42 with a QOC of 6.0/10, while SPPP trades at $14.92 with a QOC of 6.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).