PGC vs SAN

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cor vs Banco Santander, S.A. Sponsored — Valuation Comparison 2026

PGC

Commercial Banks, NEC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cor
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$43.25
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

SAN

Commercial Banks, NEC
Banco Santander, S.A. Sponsored
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$12.48
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PGC Fair ValuePGC Upside SAN Fair ValueSAN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $22.65 -47.6% $4.06 -67.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $25.23 -41.7% $4.68 -60.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PGC vs SAN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PGC vs SAN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PGC scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs SAN's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cor (PGC) and Banco Santander, S.A. Sponsored (SAN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PGC currently trades at $43.25 with a QOC of 9.6/10, while SAN trades at $12.48 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).