PAHC vs PCRX

Phibro Animal Health Corporatio vs Pacira BioSciences, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

PAHC

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Phibro Animal Health Corporatio
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$31.83
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

PCRX

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Pacira BioSciences, Inc.
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$23.68
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType PAHC Fair ValuePAHC Upside PCRX Fair ValuePCRX Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.39 -98.8% $60.11 +153.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.11 -74.5% $33.57 +41.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for PAHC vs PCRX — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

PAHC vs PCRX — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PCRX scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs PAHC's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Phibro Animal Health Corporatio (PAHC) and Pacira BioSciences, Inc. (PCRX) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

PAHC currently trades at $31.83 with a QOC of 7.7/10, while PCRX trades at $23.68 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).