OSTX vs PAHC

OS Therapies Incorporated vs Phibro Animal Health Corporatio — Valuation Comparison 2026

OSTX

Pharmaceutical Preparations
OS Therapies Incorporated
Quality
3.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$2.14
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

PAHC

Pharmaceutical Preparations
Phibro Animal Health Corporatio
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$30.79
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType OSTX Fair ValueOSTX Upside PAHC Fair ValuePAHC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.47 -77.9% $0.39 -98.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $8.11 -73.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $1.95 -9.1% $44.18 +43.5%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for OSTX vs PAHC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

OSTX vs PAHC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PAHC scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs OSTX's 3.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing OS Therapies Incorporated (OSTX) and Phibro Animal Health Corporatio (PAHC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

OSTX currently trades at $2.14 with a QOC of 3.1/10, while PAHC trades at $30.79 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).