OPRT vs PAPL

Oportun Financial Corporation vs Pineapple Financial Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

OPRT

Finance Services
Oportun Financial Corporation
Quality
7.6
out of 10
Value Trap
45
WARN
Price
$5.42
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

PAPL

Finance Services
Pineapple Financial Inc.
Quality
5.4
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$1.07
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType OPRT Fair ValueOPRT Upside PAPL Fair ValuePAPL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.65 -38.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.19 +14.3% $1.14 -22.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $6.93 +27.8% $0.69 -35.3%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for OPRT vs PAPL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

OPRT vs PAPL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

OPRT scores higher with a 7.6/10 quality rating vs PAPL's 5.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Oportun Financial Corporation (OPRT) and Pineapple Financial Inc. (PAPL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

OPRT currently trades at $5.42 with a QOC of 7.6/10, while PAPL trades at $1.07 with a QOC of 5.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).