OMSE vs STAK

OMS Energy Technologies Inc. vs STAK Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

OMSE

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment
OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$4.70
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

STAK

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment
STAK Inc.
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$0.96
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType OMSE Fair ValueOMSE Upside STAK Fair ValueSTAK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.26 -73.2% $0.31 -67.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.34 -92.6% $1.63 +40.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for OMSE vs STAK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

OMSE vs STAK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

OMSE scores higher with a 2.0/10 quality rating vs STAK's 1.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing OMS Energy Technologies Inc. (OMSE) and STAK Inc. (STAK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

OMSE currently trades at $4.70 with a QOC of 2.0/10, while STAK trades at $0.96 with a QOC of 1.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).