OLPX vs YCBD

Olaplex Holdings, Inc. vs cbdMD, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

OLPX

Perfumes, Cosmetics & Other Toilet Preparations
Olaplex Holdings, Inc.
Quality
7.1
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$2.04
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

YCBD

Perfumes, Cosmetics & Other Toilet Preparations
cbdMD, Inc.
Quality
5.3
out of 10
Value Trap
37
LOW
Price
$0.79
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType OLPX Fair ValueOLPX Upside YCBD Fair ValueYCBD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.61 +77.0% $0.30 -61.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.03 -98.6% $2.68 +208.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for OLPX vs YCBD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

OLPX vs YCBD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

OLPX scores higher with a 7.1/10 quality rating vs YCBD's 5.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Olaplex Holdings, Inc. (OLPX) and cbdMD, Inc. (YCBD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

OLPX currently trades at $2.04 with a QOC of 7.1/10, while YCBD trades at $0.79 with a QOC of 5.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).