NYC vs OHI

American Strategic Investment C vs Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc — Valuation Comparison 2026

NYC

Real Estate Investment Trusts
American Strategic Investment C
Quality
4.7
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$8.58
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

OHI

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc
Quality
8.3
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$46.76
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NYC Fair ValueNYC Upside OHI Fair ValueOHI Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $16.08 +102.0% $33.74 -27.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.60 -92.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $50.72 +457.3% $40.31 -13.8%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NYC vs OHI — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NYC vs OHI — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

OHI scores higher with a 8.3/10 quality rating vs NYC's 4.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing American Strategic Investment C (NYC) and Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc (OHI) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NYC currently trades at $8.58 with a QOC of 4.7/10, while OHI trades at $46.76 with a QOC of 8.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).