NML vs NMS

1525 vs Nuveen Minnesota Quality Munici — Valuation Comparison 2026

NML

Asset Management
1525
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$9.96
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

NMS

Asset Management
Nuveen Minnesota Quality Munici
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$12.23
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NML Fair ValueNML Upside NMS Fair ValueNMS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.64 -73.5% $3.24 -73.5%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $6.29 -36.8% $6.99 -42.8%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NML vs NMS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NML vs NMS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NMS scores higher with a 1.8/10 quality rating vs NML's 1.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing 1525 (NML) and Nuveen Minnesota Quality Munici (NMS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NML currently trades at $9.96 with a QOC of 1.8/10, while NMS trades at $12.23 with a QOC of 1.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).