NAGE vs SNYR

Niagen Bioscience, Inc. vs Synergy CHC Corp. — Valuation Comparison 2026

NAGE

Medicinal Chemicals & Botanical Products
Niagen Bioscience, Inc.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$3.86
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

SNYR

Medicinal Chemicals & Botanical Products
Synergy CHC Corp.
Quality
4.4
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$0.27
Last close
Models
5/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NAGE Fair ValueNAGE Upside SNYR Fair ValueSNYR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.66 -5.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.53 -34.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $3.94 +2.2% $1.11 +312.6%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $4.33 +12.2% $1.05 +288.9%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NAGE vs SNYR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NAGE vs SNYR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NAGE scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs SNYR's 4.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Niagen Bioscience, Inc. (NAGE) and Synergy CHC Corp. (SNYR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NAGE currently trades at $3.86 with a QOC of 8.9/10, while SNYR trades at $0.27 with a QOC of 4.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).