NAD vs NAN

Nuveen Quality Municipal Income vs Nuveen New York Quality Municip — Valuation Comparison 2026

NAD

Asset Management
Nuveen Quality Municipal Income
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.84
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

NAN

Asset Management
Nuveen New York Quality Municip
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$11.46
Last close
Models
10/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType NAD Fair ValueNAD Upside NAN Fair ValueNAN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $3.49 -70.5% $3.03 -73.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.56 -60.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $10.63 -8.6% $7.52 -34.4%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for NAD vs NAN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

NAD vs NAN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NAN scores higher with a 1.8/10 quality rating vs NAD's 1.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Nuveen Quality Municipal Income (NAD) and Nuveen New York Quality Municip (NAN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

NAD currently trades at $11.84 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while NAN trades at $11.46 with a QOC of 1.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).