MUFG vs PGC

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, vs Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cor — Valuation Comparison 2026

MUFG

Commercial Banks, NEC
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group,
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$18.71
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

PGC

Commercial Banks, NEC
Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cor
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$43.25
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MUFG Fair ValueMUFG Upside PGC Fair ValuePGC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $22.65 -47.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $25.23 -41.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $2.24 -88.0% $29.01 -32.9%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $43.85 +134.4% $5.75 -86.7%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MUFG vs PGC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MUFG vs PGC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PGC scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs MUFG's 7.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, (MUFG) and Peapack-Gladstone Financial Cor (PGC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MUFG currently trades at $18.71 with a QOC of 7.8/10, while PGC trades at $43.25 with a QOC of 9.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).