MTD vs NDRA

Mettler-Toledo International, I vs ENDRA Life Sciences Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MTD

Diagnostics & Research
Mettler-Toledo International, I
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$1163.50
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

NDRA

Diagnostics & Research
ENDRA Life Sciences Inc.
Quality
3.6
out of 10
Value Trap
39
LOW
Price
$5.52
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MTD Fair ValueMTD Upside NDRA Fair ValueNDRA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $704.94 -39.4% $1.48 -73.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $217.59 -81.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $9.42 +70.7%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MTD vs NDRA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MTD vs NDRA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MTD scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs NDRA's 3.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mettler-Toledo International, I (MTD) and ENDRA Life Sciences Inc. (NDRA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MTD currently trades at $1163.50 with a QOC of 9.3/10, while NDRA trades at $5.52 with a QOC of 3.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).