MLCIL vs PJT

Mount Logan Capital Inc. - 8.00 vs PJT Partners Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MLCIL

Investment Advice
Mount Logan Capital Inc. - 8.00
Quality
3.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$22.95
Last close
Models
6/13
Active
VS

PJT

Investment Advice
PJT Partners Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$152.90
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MLCIL Fair ValueMLCIL Upside PJT Fair ValuePJT Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $148.07 -3.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $37.92 -75.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $6.58 -71.3% $1.43 -99.1%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $124.27 +441.5% $136.19 -10.9%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MLCIL vs PJT — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MLCIL vs PJT — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

PJT scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs MLCIL's 3.6/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mount Logan Capital Inc. - 8.00 (MLCIL) and PJT Partners Inc. (PJT) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MLCIL currently trades at $22.95 with a QOC of 3.6/10, while PJT trades at $152.90 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).