MINE vs NICM

Mayfair Gold Corp. vs Nicola Mining Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MINE

Metal Mining
Mayfair Gold Corp.
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$3.11
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

NICM

Metal Mining
Nicola Mining Inc.
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$6.65
Last close
Models
6/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MINE Fair ValueMINE Upside NICM Fair ValueNICM Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.80 -74.1% $1.62 -75.6%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $2.40 -22.7%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $0.35 -94.2%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MINE vs NICM — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MINE vs NICM — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

Both MINE and NICM score 1.7/10 on quality. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mayfair Gold Corp. (MINE) and Nicola Mining Inc. (NICM) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MINE currently trades at $3.11 with a QOC of 1.7/10, while NICM trades at $6.65 with a QOC of 1.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).