MIAX vs NAKA

Miami International Holdings, I vs Nakamoto Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MIAX

Capital Markets
Miami International Holdings, I
Quality
6.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$47.76
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

NAKA

Capital Markets
Nakamoto Inc.
Quality
3.9
out of 10
Value Trap
26
LOW
Price
$5.60
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MIAX Fair ValueMIAX Upside NAKA Fair ValueNAKA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $18.99 -60.2% $1.59 -71.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $17.74 -62.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $6.91 -85.5% $0.53 -90.5%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MIAX vs NAKA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MIAX vs NAKA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MIAX scores higher with a 6.3/10 quality rating vs NAKA's 3.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Miami International Holdings, I (MIAX) and Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MIAX currently trades at $47.76 with a QOC of 6.3/10, while NAKA trades at $5.60 with a QOC of 3.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).