MHNC vs NODK

Maiden Holdings North America, vs NI Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MHNC

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Maiden Holdings North America,
Quality
4.3
out of 10
Value Trap
50
WARN
Price
$12.45
Last close
Models
4/13
Active
VS

NODK

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
NI Holdings, Inc.
Quality
7.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$13.98
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MHNC Fair ValueMHNC Upside NODK Fair ValueNODK Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.87 -86.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $4.37 -68.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $3.25 -73.9% $12.55 -10.2%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $9.62 -22.7% $23.88 +70.8%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MHNC vs NODK — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MHNC vs NODK — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

NODK scores higher with a 7.0/10 quality rating vs MHNC's 4.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Maiden Holdings North America, (MHNC) and NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MHNC currently trades at $12.45 with a QOC of 4.3/10, while NODK trades at $13.98 with a QOC of 7.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).