MHF vs MIY

Western Asset Municipal High In vs Blackrock MuniYield Michigan Qu — Valuation Comparison 2026

By CirclFi Research Team · Updated 2026-06-03 · Data from SEC EDGAR, FRED & GDELT

Quick Summary — Both MHF and MIY score 1.7/10 on quality. MHF trades at $6.95 while MIY trades at $12.15. Both analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR data across 13 institutional models.

MHF

Asset Management
Western Asset Municipal High In
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$6.95
Last close
Models
9/13
Active
VS

MIY

Asset Management
Blackrock MuniYield Michigan Qu
Quality
1.7
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$12.15
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
MHF
2 models active
Quality 1.7/10 — below average
MIY
2 models active
Quality 1.7/10 — below average

MHF vs MIY — Fair Value Comparison

MHF
$0$3$5$8 Price$6.95 Bayesian …$1.81 (-74.0%) Markov DDM$4.34 (-36.6%)
MIY
$0$5$10$14 Price$12.15 Bayesian …$3.16 (-74.0%) Markov DDM$6.73 (-43.9%)
Market Price Model 1 Model 2

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MHF Fair ValueMHF Upside MIY Fair ValueMIY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.81 -74.0% $3.16 -74.0%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $4.34 -36.6% $6.73 -43.9%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%

MHF vs MIY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued in 2026?

Both MHF and MIY score 1.7/10 on quality. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

How Do MHF and MIY Valuations Compare?

At $6.95, MHF trades +74.0% above its Bayesian DCF fair value of $1.81, while MIY at $12.15 trades +74.0% above its estimate of $3.16. MHF shows a wider gap between price and intrinsic value.

Quality of Company: MHF vs MIY

MHF earns a Quality of Company score of 1.7/10 compared to MIY's 1.7/10. The scores are closely matched, indicating similar fundamental quality profiles. The QOC score synthesizes 32 signals spanning profitability margins, revenue growth, free cash flow, capital allocation, and leverage.

Value Trap Risk: MHF vs MIY

Review the value trap analysis for both MHF and MIY to assess whether apparent undervaluation reflects genuine opportunity or hidden fundamental risk.

Both in Asset Management

Both MHF and MIY operate in Asset Management, which has 448 stocks tracked by CirclFi. Same-industry comparisons provide the most direct insight into relative valuation since both companies face similar regulatory environments, market dynamics, and competitive pressures. Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN), and ensemble methods (CUCE).

2 of 13 MODELS UNLOCKED

You’re comparing 2 models. 11 more have an opinion.

11 hidden models compare MHF vs MIY differently — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more. Some may disagree with the 2 you see above.

11 additional fair values per stock Full confidence breakdown Live terminal — 5,000+ stocks

Bloomberg Terminal: ~$2,000/mo  ·  FactSet: ~$1,000/mo  ·  CirclFi: $0.90/day

See All 13 Models — $0.90/day

We don’t predict prices. We show you what 13 independent mathematical frameworks say a stock is worth — and let you decide.

See all Asset Management stocks →