MGA vs MLR

Magna International, Inc. vs Miller Industries, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MGA

Auto Parts
Magna International, Inc.
Quality
2.5
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$66.12
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

MLR

Auto Parts
Miller Industries, Inc.
Quality
7.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$48.84
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MGA Fair ValueMGA Upside MLR Fair ValueMLR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $20.68 -68.7% $46.98 -3.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $56.11 -10.5% $12.59 -74.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MGA vs MLR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MGA vs MLR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MLR scores higher with a 7.8/10 quality rating vs MGA's 2.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Magna International, Inc. (MGA) and Miller Industries, Inc. (MLR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MGA currently trades at $66.12 with a QOC of 2.5/10, while MLR trades at $48.84 with a QOC of 7.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).