MCW vs RUSHB

Mister Car Wash, Inc. vs Rush Enterprises, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

MCW

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Mister Car Wash, Inc.
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$7.10
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

RUSHB

Auto & Truck Dealerships
Rush Enterprises, Inc.
Quality
9.3
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$66.28
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MCW Fair ValueMCW Upside RUSHB Fair ValueRUSHB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.66 -90.7% $36.57 -44.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.74 -89.5% $19.31 -70.9%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MCW vs RUSHB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MCW vs RUSHB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

RUSHB scores higher with a 9.3/10 quality rating vs MCW's 9.1/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Mister Car Wash, Inc. (MCW) and Rush Enterprises, Inc. (RUSHB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MCW currently trades at $7.10 with a QOC of 9.1/10, while RUSHB trades at $66.28 with a QOC of 9.3/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).