MARA vs MEGL

MARA Holdings, Inc. vs Magic Empire Global Limited — Valuation Comparison 2026

MARA

Finance Services
MARA Holdings, Inc.
Quality
5.4
out of 10
Value Trap
38
LOW
Price
$14.38
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

MEGL

Finance Services
Magic Empire Global Limited
Quality
5.6
out of 10
Value Trap
35
LOW
Price
$1.20
Last close
Models
9/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MARA Fair ValueMARA Upside MEGL Fair ValueMEGL Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.65 -88.5% $1.86 +54.9%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $21.25 +64.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $37.26 +159.1% $1.63 +35.8%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MARA vs MEGL — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MARA vs MEGL — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MEGL scores higher with a 5.6/10 quality rating vs MARA's 5.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) and Magic Empire Global Limited (MEGL) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MARA currently trades at $14.38 with a QOC of 5.4/10, while MEGL trades at $1.20 with a QOC of 5.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).