MAAS vs MFIC

Maase Inc. vs MidCap Financial Investment Cor — Valuation Comparison 2026

MAAS

Asset Management
Maase Inc.
Quality
6.1
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$11.78
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

MFIC

Asset Management
MidCap Financial Investment Cor
Quality
5.9
out of 10
Value Trap
10
SAFE
Price
$10.84
Last close
Models
8/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType MAAS Fair ValueMAAS Upside MFIC Fair ValueMFIC Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $20.50 +112.7% $26.58 +120.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $3.33 -63.8%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $0.28 -97.6% $8.07 -25.5%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for MAAS vs MFIC — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

MAAS vs MFIC — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MAAS scores higher with a 6.1/10 quality rating vs MFIC's 5.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Maase Inc. (MAAS) and MidCap Financial Investment Cor (MFIC) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

MAAS currently trades at $11.78 with a QOC of 6.1/10, while MFIC trades at $10.84 with a QOC of 5.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).