LSE vs OMSE

Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd vs OMS Energy Technologies Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LSE

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd
Quality
2.2
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$4.49
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

OMSE

Oil & Gas Field Machinery & Equipment
OMS Energy Technologies Inc.
Quality
2.0
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$4.70
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LSE Fair ValueLSE Upside OMSE Fair ValueOMSE Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.24 -72.3% $1.26 -73.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $2.13 -59.2% $0.34 -92.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LSE vs OMSE — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LSE vs OMSE — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LSE scores higher with a 2.2/10 quality rating vs OMSE's 2.0/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd (LSE) and OMS Energy Technologies Inc. (OMSE) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LSE currently trades at $4.49 with a QOC of 2.2/10, while OMSE trades at $4.70 with a QOC of 2.0/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).