LEG vs MLKN

Leggett & Platt, Incorporated vs MillerKnoll, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LEG

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$10.38
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

MLKN

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
MillerKnoll, Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
37
LOW
Price
$16.48
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LEG Fair ValueLEG Upside MLKN Fair ValueMLKN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $17.15 +65.2% $25.99 +57.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $32.85 +99.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $42.83 +312.6% $30.18 +83.1%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LEG vs MLKN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LEG vs MLKN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LEG scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs MLKN's 7.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and MillerKnoll, Inc. (MLKN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LEG currently trades at $10.38 with a QOC of 9.0/10, while MLKN trades at $16.48 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).