LEG vs LZB

Leggett & Platt, Incorporated vs La-Z-Boy Incorporated — Valuation Comparison 2026

LEG

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated
Quality
9.0
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$10.38
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

LZB

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
Quality
8.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$38.15
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LEG Fair ValueLEG Upside LZB Fair ValueLZB Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $17.15 +65.2% $45.96 +20.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $9.05 -76.3%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $42.83 +312.6% $19.85 -48.0%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LEG vs LZB — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LEG vs LZB — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LEG scores higher with a 9.0/10 quality rating vs LZB's 8.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LEG currently trades at $10.38 with a QOC of 9.0/10, while LZB trades at $38.15 with a QOC of 8.8/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).