LAZ vs MARA

Lazard, Inc. vs MARA Holdings, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

LAZ

Capital Markets
Lazard, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$48.93
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

MARA

Capital Markets
MARA Holdings, Inc.
Quality
5.4
out of 10
Value Trap
38
LOW
Price
$14.07
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType LAZ Fair ValueLAZ Upside MARA Fair ValueMARA Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $66.93 +36.8% $1.87 -86.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $10.50 -78.5% $21.25 +64.2%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for LAZ vs MARA — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

LAZ vs MARA — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LAZ scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs MARA's 5.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Lazard, Inc. (LAZ) and MARA Holdings, Inc. (MARA) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

LAZ currently trades at $48.93 with a QOC of 8.1/10, while MARA trades at $14.07 with a QOC of 5.4/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).