KULR vs VPG

KULR Technology Group, Inc. vs Vishay Precision Group, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

KULR

Electronic Components & Accessories
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$4.86
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

VPG

Electronic Components & Accessories
Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$125.25
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KULR Fair ValueKULR Upside VPG Fair ValueVPG Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.00 -79.5% $13.46 -89.3%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.56 -79.2% $14.44 -88.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KULR vs VPG — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KULR vs VPG — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

VPG scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs KULR's 6.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KULR currently trades at $4.86 with a QOC of 6.8/10, while VPG trades at $125.25 with a QOC of 8.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).