KRG vs LANDO

Kite Realty Group Trust vs Gladstone Land Corporation - 6. — Valuation Comparison 2026

KRG

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Kite Realty Group Trust
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$27.42
Last close
Models
13/13
Active
VS

LANDO

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Gladstone Land Corporation - 6.
Quality
5.7
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$20.56
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KRG Fair ValueKRG Upside LANDO Fair ValueLANDO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.73 -97.3% $1.75 -91.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $11.61 -57.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $138.38 +404.7% $3.74 -81.8%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KRG vs LANDO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KRG vs LANDO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KRG scores higher with a 8.2/10 quality rating vs LANDO's 5.7/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Kite Realty Group Trust (KRG) and Gladstone Land Corporation - 6. (LANDO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KRG currently trades at $27.42 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while LANDO trades at $20.56 with a QOC of 5.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).