KOSS vs SONO

Koss Corporation vs Sonos, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

KOSS

Household Audio & Video Equipment
Koss Corporation
Quality
6.4
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$4.08
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

SONO

Household Audio & Video Equipment
Sonos, Inc.
Quality
9.1
out of 10
Value Trap
13
SAFE
Price
$15.85
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KOSS Fair ValueKOSS Upside SONO Fair ValueSONO Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $0.10 -97.5% $13.23 -16.5%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $1.16 -73.3% $12.89 -18.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KOSS vs SONO — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KOSS vs SONO — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

SONO scores higher with a 9.1/10 quality rating vs KOSS's 6.4/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Koss Corporation (KOSS) and Sonos, Inc. (SONO) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KOSS currently trades at $4.08 with a QOC of 6.4/10, while SONO trades at $15.85 with a QOC of 9.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).