KMPR vs MCY

Kemper Corporation vs Mercury General Corporation — Valuation Comparison 2026

KMPR

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Kemper Corporation
Quality
6.5
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$24.67
Last close
Models
10/13
Active
VS

MCY

Fire, Marine & Casualty Insurance
Mercury General Corporation
Quality
9.6
out of 10
Value Trap
12
SAFE
Price
$98.03
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType KMPR Fair ValueKMPR Upside MCY Fair ValueMCY Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $78.85 +219.6% $173.20 +76.7%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $17.38 -29.6% $165.12 +68.4%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for KMPR vs MCY — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

KMPR vs MCY — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

MCY scores higher with a 9.6/10 quality rating vs KMPR's 6.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Kemper Corporation (KMPR) and Mercury General Corporation (MCY) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

KMPR currently trades at $24.67 with a QOC of 6.5/10, while MCY trades at $98.03 with a QOC of 9.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).