JRS vs KKR

Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund vs KKR & Co. Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

JRS

Asset Management
Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund
Quality
1.8
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$8.30
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

KKR

Asset Management
KKR & Co. Inc.
Quality
8.9
out of 10
Value Trap
30
LOW
Price
$94.03
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JRS Fair ValueJRS Upside KKR Fair ValueKKR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $2.20 -73.5% $132.58 +41.0%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $6.48 -93.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $5.94 -28.4% $68.86 -26.8%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JRS vs KKR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JRS vs KKR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KKR scores higher with a 8.9/10 quality rating vs JRS's 1.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Nuveen Real Estate Income Fund (JRS) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JRS currently trades at $8.30 with a QOC of 1.8/10, while KKR trades at $94.03 with a QOC of 8.9/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).