JDZG vs LAUR

JIADE LIMITED vs Laureate Education, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

JDZG

Education & Training Services
JIADE LIMITED
Quality
6.8
out of 10
Value Trap
13
SAFE
Price
$4.18
Last close
Models
11/13
Active
VS

LAUR

Education & Training Services
Laureate Education, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
5
SAFE
Price
$32.50
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JDZG Fair ValueJDZG Upside LAUR Fair ValueLAUR Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $1.92 -54.0% $12.92 -60.2%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $0.15 -87.3% $13.46 -58.6%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JDZG vs LAUR — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JDZG vs LAUR — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LAUR scores higher with a 8.5/10 quality rating vs JDZG's 6.8/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing JIADE LIMITED (JDZG) and Laureate Education, Inc. (LAUR) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JDZG currently trades at $4.18 with a QOC of 6.8/10, while LAUR trades at $32.50 with a QOC of 8.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).