JBL vs LFUS

Jabil Inc. vs Littelfuse, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

JBL

Electronic Components
Jabil Inc.
Quality
9.8
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$363.65
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

LFUS

Electronic Components
Littelfuse, Inc.
Quality
8.5
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$473.60
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType JBL Fair ValueJBL Upside LFUS Fair ValueLFUS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $136.09 -62.6% $280.46 -40.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $175.62 -51.7% $866.66 +83.0%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for JBL vs LFUS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

JBL vs LFUS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

JBL scores higher with a 9.8/10 quality rating vs LFUS's 8.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Jabil Inc. (JBL) and Littelfuse, Inc. (LFUS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

JBL currently trades at $363.65 with a QOC of 9.8/10, while LFUS trades at $473.60 with a QOC of 8.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).