J vs ROAD

Jacobs Solutions Inc. vs Construction Partners, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

J

Heavy Construction Other Than Bldg Const - Contractors
Jacobs Solutions Inc.
Quality
8.2
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$119.86
Last close
Models
12/13
Active
VS

ROAD

Heavy Construction Other Than Bldg Const - Contractors
Construction Partners, Inc.
Quality
8.7
out of 10
Value Trap
29
LOW
Price
$116.47
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType J Fair ValueJ Upside ROAD Fair ValueROAD Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $22.78 -81.0% $6.91 -94.1%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $31.77 -75.7%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $9.24 -92.3% $10.98 -90.6%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for J vs ROAD — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

J vs ROAD — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

ROAD scores higher with a 8.7/10 quality rating vs J's 8.2/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Jacobs Solutions Inc. (J) and Construction Partners, Inc. (ROAD) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

J currently trades at $119.86 with a QOC of 8.2/10, while ROAD trades at $116.47 with a QOC of 8.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).