IVVD vs KRYS

Invivyd, Inc. vs Krystal Biotech, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

IVVD

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Invivyd, Inc.
Quality
4.3
out of 10
Value Trap
24
SAFE
Price
$1.14
Last close
Models
4/13
Active
VS

KRYS

Biological Products, (No Diagnostic Substances)
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
Quality
7.7
out of 10
Value Trap
6
SAFE
Price
$309.03
Last close
Models
13/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IVVD Fair ValueIVVD Upside KRYS Fair ValueKRYS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $137.31 -55.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $61.44 -80.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $0.23 -84.6% $30.01 -90.3%
PWERM Option-Based $0.21 -82.0% $286.91 -7.2%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IVVD vs KRYS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IVVD vs KRYS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

KRYS scores higher with a 7.7/10 quality rating vs IVVD's 4.3/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Invivyd, Inc. (IVVD) and Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IVVD currently trades at $1.14 with a QOC of 4.3/10, while KRYS trades at $309.03 with a QOC of 7.7/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).