IRM vs JBGS

Iron Mountain Incorporated (Del vs JBG SMITH Properties — Valuation Comparison 2026

IRM

Real Estate Investment Trusts
Iron Mountain Incorporated (Del
Quality
7.3
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$128.25
Last close
Models
8/13
Active
VS

JBGS

Real Estate Investment Trusts
JBG SMITH Properties
Quality
5.5
out of 10
Value Trap
27
LOW
Price
$14.67
Last close
Models
11/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IRM Fair ValueIRM Upside JBGS Fair ValueJBGS Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $14.36 -2.1%
First Chicago Scenario $168.99 +31.8% $55.19 +276.2%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $9.15 -92.9% $72.60 +394.9%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IRM vs JBGS — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IRM vs JBGS — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IRM scores higher with a 7.3/10 quality rating vs JBGS's 5.5/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing Iron Mountain Incorporated (Del (IRM) and JBG SMITH Properties (JBGS) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IRM currently trades at $128.25 with a QOC of 7.3/10, while JBGS trades at $14.67 with a QOC of 5.5/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).