IPST vs LAZ

IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. vs Lazard, Inc. — Valuation Comparison 2026

IPST

Capital Markets
IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.
Quality
4.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$4.97
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

LAZ

Capital Markets
Lazard, Inc.
Quality
8.1
out of 10
Value Trap
20
SAFE
Price
$48.93
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IPST Fair ValueIPST Upside LAZ Fair ValueLAZ Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $66.93 +36.8%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $31.13 +466.1% $10.50 -78.5%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $3.50 -42.8% $13.99 -71.4%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
RCMH-DCF Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IPST vs LAZ — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IPST vs LAZ — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

LAZ scores higher with a 8.1/10 quality rating vs IPST's 4.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (IPST) and Lazard, Inc. (LAZ) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IPST currently trades at $4.97 with a QOC of 4.9/10, while LAZ trades at $48.93 with a QOC of 8.1/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).