IPST vs IREN

IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. vs IREN LIMITED — Valuation Comparison 2026

IPST

Capital Markets
IP Strategy Holdings, Inc.
Quality
4.9
out of 10
Value Trap
18
SAFE
Price
$4.97
Last close
Models
7/13
Active
VS

IREN

Capital Markets
IREN LIMITED
Quality
6.6
out of 10
Value Trap
Price
$64.05
Last close
Models
12/13
Active

Model-by-Model Comparison

ModelType IPST Fair ValueIPST Upside IREN Fair ValueIREN Upside
Bayesian DCF Intrinsic $13.73 -78.6%
Earnings Power Value Intrinsic $31.13 +466.1% $13.21 -71.1%
EROIC Spread Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
First Chicago Scenario $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Markov DDM Intrinsic $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
ML-RIV Intrinsic $3.50 -42.8% $11.83 -81.5%
Dynamic NAV Asset-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
PWERM Option-Based $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Regime Cross-Sectional Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
Sentiment SOTP Hybrid $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
CUCE Ensemble Ensemble $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
FTNN Topology Relative $•••.•• ••.•% $•••.•• ••.•%
🔒

Unlock Full 13-Model Comparison

Access all valuation models for IPST vs IREN — including EROIC Spread, First Chicago, Markov DDM, PWERM, and 7 more.

Access Full Analysis — From $27/mo →

IPST vs IREN — Which Stock Is More Undervalued?

IREN scores higher with a 6.6/10 quality rating vs IPST's 4.9/10. Both stocks are analyzed daily using SEC EDGAR filings across 13 independent models.

Comparing IP Strategy Holdings, Inc. (IPST) and IREN LIMITED (IREN) across 13 institutional-grade valuation models reveals how each company's intrinsic value stacks up against its market price. CirclFi's engine processes SEC EDGAR 10-K and 10-Q filings, FRED macroeconomic data, and GDELT news sentiment to generate independent fair value estimates daily.

IPST currently trades at $4.97 with a QOC of 4.9/10, while IREN trades at $64.05 with a QOC of 6.6/10.

Both companies are analyzed with models spanning intrinsic (Bayesian DCF, EPV), scenario-based (First Chicago), regime-switching (Markov DDM, RCMH-DCF), machine learning (ML-RIV, FTNN Topology), and ensemble methods (CUCE).